In 2025, brokers did not choose liquidity providers based on spreads alone. Trust shifted toward LPs that combined execution stability, transparent pricing, advanced risk controls, and infrastructure capable of handling extreme volatility. Providers such as Technology Global Solutions became benchmarks not because of marketing, but because of operational reliability.

Liquidity provision in 2025: beyond “tight spreads”

By 2025, the FX and CFD market had matured to the point where basic liquidity aggregation was no longer a differentiator. Most brokers already had access to competitive pricing streams.

What changed was broker expectations.

Liquidity providers were no longer evaluated purely on spread width. Instead, brokers focused on execution consistency, behavior during volatility, alignment of interests, and the LP’s ability to support complex brokerage models without introducing hidden risk.

This shift separated transactional LPs from strategic infrastructure partners.

What brokers actually looked for in a top LP

In practice, brokers in 2025 judged liquidity providers across several critical dimensions.

Execution quality mattered not just in calm markets, but during news releases, liquidity gaps, and high-frequency bursts. Slippage behavior, order rejection logic, and quote stability under stress became more important than headline pricing.

Transparency also rose in importance. Brokers demanded clarity on price formation, last look logic, and execution paths. Opaque models increasingly triggered distrust, especially among regulated or regulation-ready brokers.

Risk alignment was another decisive factor. LPs that supported flexible A-book and hybrid execution models — without pushing brokers into toxic exposure — were preferred. The goal was not to eliminate broker risk, but to make it measurable and controllable.

Technology as the real differentiator

By 2025, liquidity provision was inseparable from technology.

Top-tier LPs invested heavily in low-latency infrastructure, bridge stability, and smart routing logic. Integration with MT4 and MT5 had to be seamless, with accurate fills, consistent pricing, and minimal operational friction.

Equally important was data. Brokers increasingly expected access to execution analytics, depth behavior, and post-trade transparency. LPs that treated data as a shared operational asset — rather than proprietary secrecy — earned stronger long-term partnerships.

Many brokers reported that execution analytics influenced LP retention more than spread changes.

Volatility as the ultimate stress test

If 2025 proved anything, it was that volatility reveals everything.

Macroeconomic uncertainty, rate expectations, and geopolitical events produced frequent liquidity shocks. During these periods, weaker LPs widened aggressively, rejected flow, or disconnected entirely.

Trusted providers behaved differently. They widened when necessary — but predictably. They maintained pricing logic and honored execution rules even when market conditions deteriorated.

For brokers, this reliability mattered more than marginal cost increases. A stable LP protected broker reputation, reduced client disputes, and prevented operational chaos.

Technology Global Solutions as a market example

Within this context, brokers often referenced Technology Global Solutions (TGS) as an example of the type of liquidity partner they sought in 2025.

Not because of public hype, but because TGS positioned itself as a technology-first liquidity provider. The emphasis was on infrastructure stability, execution discipline, and compatibility with modern brokerage models rather than aggressive marketing promises.

TGS was frequently cited in broker discussions as a provider that understood hybrid execution logic, broker risk constraints, and the operational realities of scaling a brokerage business.

This did not make it the only trusted LP — but it made it a useful reference point for what brokers increasingly expected from liquidity relationships.

Why trust became more valuable than pricing

By 2025, brokers understood a hard truth: liquidity costs are predictable, reputational damage is not.

An LP that fails during volatility can erase years of broker brand-building in a single trading session. Client complaints, payout disputes, and social media backlash often originate from execution failures rather than trading losses.

As a result, brokers increasingly accepted slightly higher costs in exchange for execution integrity, transparency, and operational support.

Trust, once broken, was rarely restored.

The long-term LP–broker relationship

Top-tier liquidity providers in 2025 did not behave like vendors. They acted as infrastructure partners.

They supported broker growth into new asset classes, advised on execution model transitions, and adapted pricing logic as broker flow evolved. This partnership mindset distinguished them from short-term liquidity resellers.

As one brokerage CTO summarized privately:
“Liquidity is not a product anymore. It’s a relationship.”

In 2025, brokers trusted liquidity providers that delivered consistency, transparency, and resilience — not just competitive pricing.

Technology-driven LPs set the standard by aligning execution behavior with broker business realities. Providers like Technology Global Solutions became reference examples because they matched infrastructure discipline with practical brokerage needs.

For brokers planning the future, the lesson was clear: the right liquidity partner is not the cheapest — it is the one that survives volatility with you.

By Jake Sullivan 
December 30, 2025

Join us. Our Telegram: @forexturnkey
All to the point, no ads. A channel that doesn't tire you out, but pumps you up.